Rev 3 | Details | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | RSS feed
Rev | Author | Line No. | Line |
---|---|---|---|
2 | pj | 1 | FFTW FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS |
2 | 18 May 1999 |
||
3 | Matteo Frigo |
||
4 | Steven G. Johnson |
||
5 | <fftw@theory.lcs.mit.edu> |
||
6 | |||
7 | This is the list of Frequently Asked Questions about FFTW, a collection of |
||
8 | fast C routines for computing the Discrete Fourier Transform in one or |
||
9 | more dimensions. |
||
10 | |||
11 | =============================================================================== |
||
12 | |||
13 | Index |
||
14 | |||
15 | Section 1. Introduction and General Information |
||
16 | Q1.1 What is FFTW? |
||
17 | Q1.2 How do I obtain FFTW? |
||
18 | Q1.3 Is FFTW free software? |
||
19 | Q1.4 What is this about non-free licenses? |
||
20 | |||
21 | Section 2. Installing FFTW |
||
22 | Q2.1 Which systems does FFTW run on? |
||
23 | Q2.2 Does FFTW run on DOS/Windows? |
||
24 | Q2.3 My compiler crashes when compiling FFTW. |
||
25 | Q2.4 FFTW does not compile on Solaris, complaining about const. |
||
26 | Q2.5 Which language is FFTW written in? |
||
27 | Q2.6 Can I call FFTW from FORTRAN? |
||
28 | Q2.7 Can I call FFTW from C++? |
||
29 | Q2.8 Why isn't FFTW written in FORTRAN/C++? |
||
30 | Q2.9 How do I compile FFTW to run in single precision? |
||
31 | |||
32 | Section 3. Using FFTW |
||
33 | Q3.1 FFTW seems really slow. |
||
34 | Q3.2 FFTW gives results different from my old FFT. |
||
35 | Q3.3 Can I save FFTW's plans? |
||
36 | Q3.4 Why does your inverse transform return a scaled result? |
||
37 | Q3.5 How can I make FFTW put the origin (zero frequency) at the center |
||
38 | Q3.6 How do I FFT an image/audio file in *foobar* format? |
||
39 | Q3.7 My program does not link (on Unix). |
||
40 | |||
41 | Section 4. Internals of FFTW |
||
42 | Q4.1 How does FFTW work? |
||
43 | Q4.2 Why is FFTW so fast? |
||
44 | Q4.3 What is this wisdom thing? |
||
45 | Q4.4 Why do you use wisdom? I just wanted to save a plan. |
||
46 | |||
47 | Section 5. Known bugs |
||
48 | Q5.1 FFTW 1.1 crashes in rfftwnd on Linux. |
||
49 | Q5.2 The MPI transforms in FFTW 1.2 give incorrect results/leak memory. |
||
50 | Q5.3 The test programs in FFTW 1.2.1 fail when I change FFTW to use sin |
||
51 | Q5.4 The test program in FFTW 1.2.1 fails for n > 46340. |
||
52 | Q5.5 The threaded code fails on Linux Redhat 5.0 |
||
53 | Q5.6 FFTW 2.0's rfftwnd fails for rank > 1 transforms with a final dime |
||
54 | Q5.7 FFTW 2.0's complex transforms give the wrong results with prime fa |
||
55 | Q5.8 FFTW 2.1.1's MPI test programs crash with MPICH. |
||
56 | |||
57 | =============================================================================== |
||
58 | |||
59 | Section 1. Introduction and General Information |
||
60 | |||
61 | Q1.1 What is FFTW? |
||
62 | Q1.2 How do I obtain FFTW? |
||
63 | Q1.3 Is FFTW free software? |
||
64 | Q1.4 What is this about non-free licenses? |
||
65 | |||
66 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
67 | |||
68 | Question 1.1. What is FFTW? |
||
69 | |||
70 | FFTW is a free collection of fast C routines for computing the Discrete |
||
71 | Fourier Transform in one or more dimensions. It includes complex, real, |
||
72 | and parallel transforms, and can handle arbitrary array sizes efficiently. |
||
73 | FFTW is typically faster than other publically-available FFT |
||
74 | implementations, and is even competitive with vendor-tuned libraries. |
||
75 | (See our web page for extensive benchmarks.) To achieve this performance, |
||
76 | FFTW uses novel code-generation and runtime self-optimization techniques |
||
77 | (along with many other tricks). |
||
78 | |||
79 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
80 | |||
81 | Question 1.2. How do I obtain FFTW? |
||
82 | |||
83 | FFTW can be found at the FFTW web page. You can also retrieve it from |
||
84 | theory.lcs.mit.edu in /pub/fftw. |
||
85 | |||
86 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
87 | |||
88 | Question 1.3. Is FFTW free software? |
||
89 | |||
90 | Starting with version 1.3, FFTW is Free Software in the technical sense |
||
91 | defined by the Free Software Foundation (see Categories of Free and |
||
92 | Non-Free Software), and is distributed under the terms of the GNU General |
||
93 | Public License. Previous versions of FFTW were distributed without fee |
||
94 | for noncommercial use, but were not technically ``free.'' |
||
95 | |||
96 | Non-free licenses for FFTW are also available that permit different terms |
||
97 | of use than the GPL. |
||
98 | |||
99 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
100 | |||
101 | Question 1.4. What is this about non-free licenses? |
||
102 | |||
103 | The non-free licenses are for companies that wish to use FFTW in their |
||
104 | products but are unwilling to release their software under the GPL (which |
||
105 | would require them to release source code and allow free redistribution). |
||
106 | Such users can purchase an unlimited-use license from MIT. Contact us for |
||
107 | more details. |
||
108 | |||
109 | We could instead have released FFTW under the LGPL, or even disallowed |
||
110 | non-Free usage. Suffice it to say, however, that MIT owns the copyright |
||
111 | to FFTW and they only let us GPL it because we convinced them that it |
||
112 | would neither affect their licensing revenue nor irritate existing |
||
113 | licensees. |
||
114 | |||
115 | =============================================================================== |
||
116 | |||
117 | Section 2. Installing FFTW |
||
118 | |||
119 | Q2.1 Which systems does FFTW run on? |
||
120 | Q2.2 Does FFTW run on DOS/Windows? |
||
121 | Q2.3 My compiler crashes when compiling FFTW. |
||
122 | Q2.4 FFTW does not compile on Solaris, complaining about const. |
||
123 | Q2.5 Which language is FFTW written in? |
||
124 | Q2.6 Can I call FFTW from FORTRAN? |
||
125 | Q2.7 Can I call FFTW from C++? |
||
126 | Q2.8 Why isn't FFTW written in FORTRAN/C++? |
||
127 | Q2.9 How do I compile FFTW to run in single precision? |
||
128 | |||
129 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
130 | |||
131 | Question 2.1. Which systems does FFTW run on? |
||
132 | |||
133 | FFTW is written in ANSI C, and should work on any system with a decent C |
||
134 | compiler. (See also Q2.2 `Does FFTW run on DOS/Windows?' and Q2.3 `My |
||
135 | compiler crashes when compiling FFTW.'.) |
||
136 | |||
137 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
138 | |||
139 | Question 2.2. Does FFTW run on DOS/Windows? |
||
140 | |||
141 | It should. FFTW was not developed on DOS or Windows, but the source code |
||
142 | is straight ANSI C. Some users have reported using FFTW on DOS/Windows |
||
143 | using various compilers. See also the FFTW Windows installation notes and |
||
144 | Q2.3 `My compiler crashes when compiling FFTW.' |
||
145 | |||
146 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
147 | |||
148 | Question 2.3. My compiler crashes when compiling FFTW. |
||
149 | |||
150 | Complain fiercely to the vendor of the compiler. |
||
151 | |||
152 | FFTW is a heavily-optimized piece of software that is likely to push |
||
153 | compilers to their limits. We had no problems with, for example, gcc |
||
154 | 2.7.2, Sun's SC4.0, IBM's XLC, Metrowerks' compilers for the Macintosh, |
||
155 | and SGI's compilers for IRIX 6.2. Users have also reported successful |
||
156 | compilations of FFTW using Borland's C/C++ compilers on Windows. |
||
157 | |||
158 | Visual C++ 4.0 crashes when compiling FFTW 1.2 with all optimizations |
||
159 | turned on. Visual C++ 5.0 reportedly produces incorrect code for the real |
||
160 | transforms in FFTW 2.x when the option "Maximize speed" is set. We are |
||
161 | told that Service Pack 3 fixes the bug. |
||
162 | |||
163 | Various problems have also been observed with SGI's MIPSpro compilers, |
||
164 | versions 7.2.0 and 7.2.1 (you may have to lower the optimization level for |
||
165 | some files to get them to compile). The test program in earlier versions |
||
166 | of FFTW had problems with the -xO5 option in Sun's SC4.0 C compiler. |
||
167 | |||
168 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
169 | |||
170 | Question 2.4. FFTW does not compile on Solaris, complaining about const. |
||
171 | |||
172 | We know that at least on Solaris 2.5.x with Sun's compilers 4.2 you might |
||
173 | get error messages from make such as |
||
174 | |||
175 | "./fftw.h", line 88: warning: const is a keyword in ANSI C |
||
176 | |||
177 | This is the case when the configure script reports that const does not |
||
178 | work: |
||
179 | |||
180 | checking for working const... (cached) no |
||
181 | |||
182 | You should be aware that Solaris comes with two compilers, namely, |
||
183 | /opt/SUNWspro/SC4.2/bin/cc and /usr/ucb/cc. The latter compiler is |
||
184 | non-ANSI. Indeed, it is a perverse shell script that calls the real |
||
185 | compiler in non-ANSI mode. In order to compile FFTW, change your path so |
||
186 | that the right cc is used. |
||
187 | |||
188 | To know whether your compiler is the right one, type cc -V. If the |
||
189 | compiler prints ``ucbcc'', as in |
||
190 | |||
191 | ucbcc: WorkShop Compilers 4.2 30 Oct 1996 C 4.2 |
||
192 | |||
193 | then the compiler is wrong. The right message is something like |
||
194 | |||
195 | cc: WorkShop Compilers 4.2 30 Oct 1996 C 4.2 |
||
196 | |||
197 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
198 | |||
199 | Question 2.5. Which language is FFTW written in? |
||
200 | |||
201 | FFTW is written in ANSI C. Most of the code, however, was automatically |
||
202 | generated by a program called genfft, written in the Objective Caml |
||
203 | dialect of ML. You do not need to know ML or to have an Objective Caml |
||
204 | compiler in order to use FFTW. |
||
205 | |||
206 | genfft is provided with the FFTW sources, which means that you can play |
||
207 | with the code generator if you want. In this case, you need a working |
||
208 | Objective Caml system. Objective Caml is available from ftp.inria.fr in |
||
209 | the directory /lang/caml-light. |
||
210 | |||
211 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
212 | |||
213 | Question 2.6. Can I call FFTW from FORTRAN? |
||
214 | |||
215 | Yes, but not directly. The main problem is that Fortran cannot pass |
||
216 | parameters by value. However, FFTW can be called indirectly from Fortran |
||
217 | through the use of special C "wrapper" routines. Appropriate wrapper |
||
218 | code, documented in the FFTW manual, is included with FFTW (versions 1.3 |
||
219 | and higher). |
||
220 | |||
221 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
222 | |||
223 | Question 2.7. Can I call FFTW from C++? |
||
224 | |||
225 | Most definitely. FFTW should compile and run under any C++ compiler. |
||
226 | |||
227 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
228 | |||
229 | Question 2.8. Why isn't FFTW written in FORTRAN/C++? |
||
230 | |||
231 | Because we don't like those languages, and neither approaches the |
||
232 | portability of C. |
||
233 | |||
234 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
235 | |||
236 | Question 2.9. How do I compile FFTW to run in single precision? |
||
237 | |||
238 | On a Unix system: configure --enable-float. On a non-Unix system: edit |
||
239 | fftw/fftw.h to #define the symbol FFTW_ENABLE_FLOAT. In both cases, you |
||
240 | must then recompile FFTW. |
||
241 | |||
242 | =============================================================================== |
||
243 | |||
244 | Section 3. Using FFTW |
||
245 | |||
246 | Q3.1 FFTW seems really slow. |
||
247 | Q3.2 FFTW gives results different from my old FFT. |
||
248 | Q3.3 Can I save FFTW's plans? |
||
249 | Q3.4 Why does your inverse transform return a scaled result? |
||
250 | Q3.5 How can I make FFTW put the origin (zero frequency) at the center |
||
251 | Q3.6 How do I FFT an image/audio file in *foobar* format? |
||
252 | Q3.7 My program does not link (on Unix). |
||
253 | |||
254 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
255 | |||
256 | Question 3.1. FFTW seems really slow. |
||
257 | |||
258 | You are probably recreating the plan before every transform, rather than |
||
259 | creating it once and reusing it for all transforms of the same size. FFTW |
||
260 | is designed to be used in the following way: |
||
261 | |||
262 | * First, you create a plan. This will take several seconds. |
||
263 | * Then, you reuse the plan many times to perform FFTs. These are fast. |
||
264 | |||
265 | If you don't need to compute many transforms and the time for the planner |
||
266 | is significant, you have two options. First, you can use the |
||
267 | FFTW_ESTIMATE option in the planner, which uses heuristics instead of |
||
268 | runtime measurements and produces a good plan in a short time. Second, |
||
269 | you can use the wisdom feature to precompute the plan; see Q3.3 `Can I |
||
270 | save FFTW's plans?' |
||
271 | |||
272 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
273 | |||
274 | Question 3.2. FFTW gives results different from my old FFT. |
||
275 | |||
276 | People follow many different conventions for the DFT, and you should be |
||
277 | sure to know the ones that we use (described in the FFTW manual). In |
||
278 | particular, you should be aware that the FFTW_FORWARD/FFTW_BACKWARD |
||
279 | directions correspond to signs of -1/+1 in the exponent of the DFT |
||
280 | definition. (*Numerical Recipes* uses the opposite convention.) |
||
281 | |||
282 | You should also know that we compute an unnormalized transform. In |
||
283 | contrast, Matlab is an example of program that computes a normalized |
||
284 | transform. See Q3.4 `Why does your inverse transform return a scaled |
||
285 | result?'. |
||
286 | |||
287 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
288 | |||
289 | Question 3.3. Can I save FFTW's plans? |
||
290 | |||
291 | Yes. Starting with version 1.2, FFTW provides the wisdom mechanism for |
||
292 | saving plans. See Q4.3 `What is this wisdom thing?' and the FFTW manual. |
||
293 | |||
294 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
295 | |||
296 | Question 3.4. Why does your inverse transform return a scaled result? |
||
297 | |||
298 | Computing the forward transform followed by the backward transform (or |
||
299 | vice versa) yields the original array scaled by the size of the array. |
||
300 | (For multi-dimensional transforms, the size of the array is the product of |
||
301 | the dimensions.) We could, instead, have chosen a normalization that |
||
302 | would have returned the unscaled array. Or, to accomodate the many |
||
303 | conventions in this matter, the transform routines could have accepted a |
||
304 | "scale factor" parameter. We did not do this, however, for two reasons. |
||
305 | First, we didn't want to sacrifice performance in the common case where |
||
306 | the scale factor is 1. Second, in real applications the FFT is followed or |
||
307 | preceded by some computation on the data, into which the scale factor can |
||
308 | typically be absorbed at little or no cost. |
||
309 | |||
310 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
311 | |||
312 | Question 3.5. How can I make FFTW put the origin (zero frequency) at the center of its output? |
||
313 | |||
314 | For human viewing of a spectrum, it is often convenient to put the origin |
||
315 | in frequency space at the center of the output array, rather than in the |
||
316 | zero-th element (the default in FFTW). If all of the dimensions of your |
||
317 | array are even, you can accomplish this by simply multiplying each element |
||
318 | of the input array by (-1)^(i + j + ...), where i, j, etcetera are the |
||
319 | indices of the element. (This trick is a general property of the DFT, and |
||
320 | is not specific to FFTW.) |
||
321 | |||
322 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
323 | |||
324 | Question 3.6. How do I FFT an image/audio file in *foobar* format? |
||
325 | |||
326 | FFTW performs an FFT on an array of floating-point values. You can |
||
327 | certainly use it to compute the transform of an image or audio stream, but |
||
328 | you are responsible for figuring out your data format and converting it to |
||
329 | the form FFTW requires. |
||
330 | |||
331 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
332 | |||
333 | Question 3.7. My program does not link (on Unix). |
||
334 | |||
335 | Please use the exact order in which libraries are specified by the FFTW |
||
336 | manual (e.g. -lrfftw -lfftw -lm). Also, note that the libraries must be |
||
337 | listed after your program sources/objects. (The general rule is that if |
||
338 | *A* uses *B*, then *A* must be listed before *B* in the link command.). |
||
339 | For example, switching the order to -lfftw -lrfftw -lm will fail. |
||
340 | |||
341 | =============================================================================== |
||
342 | |||
343 | Section 4. Internals of FFTW |
||
344 | |||
345 | Q4.1 How does FFTW work? |
||
346 | Q4.2 Why is FFTW so fast? |
||
347 | Q4.3 What is this wisdom thing? |
||
348 | Q4.4 Why do you use wisdom? I just wanted to save a plan. |
||
349 | |||
350 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
351 | |||
352 | Question 4.1. How does FFTW work? |
||
353 | |||
354 | The innovation (if it can be so called) in FFTW consists in having an |
||
355 | interpreter execute the transform. The program for the interpreter (the |
||
356 | *plan*) is computed at runtime according to the characteristics of your |
||
357 | machine/compiler. This peculiar software architecture allows FFTW to |
||
358 | adapt itself to almost any machine. |
||
359 | |||
360 | For more details, see the paper "The Fastest Fourier Transform in the |
||
361 | West", by M. Frigo and S. G. Johnson, available at the FFTW web page. See |
||
362 | also "FFTW: An Adaptive Software Architecture for the FFT", in ICASSP '98. |
||
363 | |||
364 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
365 | |||
366 | Question 4.2. Why is FFTW so fast? |
||
367 | |||
368 | This is a complex question, and there is no simple answer. In fact, the |
||
369 | authors do not fully know the answer, either. In addition to many small |
||
370 | performance hacks throughout FFTW, there are three general reasons for |
||
371 | FFTW's speed. |
||
372 | |||
373 | * FFTW uses an internal interpreter to adapt itself to a machine. See |
||
374 | Q4.1 `How does FFTW work?'. |
||
375 | * FFTW uses a code generator to produce highly-optimized routines for |
||
376 | computing small transforms. |
||
377 | * FFTW uses explicit divide-and-conquer to take advantage of the memory |
||
378 | hierarchy. |
||
379 | |||
380 | For more details on these three topics, see the paper "The Fastest Fourier |
||
381 | Transform in the West", by M. Frigo and S. G. Johnson, available at the |
||
382 | FFTW web page. |
||
383 | |||
384 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
385 | |||
386 | Question 4.3. What is this wisdom thing? |
||
387 | |||
388 | wisdom is the name of the mechanism that FFTW uses to save and restore |
||
389 | plans. Rather than just saving plans, FFTW remembers what it learns about |
||
390 | your machine, and becomes wiser and wiser as time passes by. You can save |
||
391 | wisdom for later use. |
||
392 | |||
393 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
394 | |||
395 | Question 4.4. Why do you use wisdom? I just wanted to save a plan. |
||
396 | |||
397 | wisdom could be implemented with less effort than a general plan-saving |
||
398 | mechanism would have required. In addition, wisdom provides additional |
||
399 | benefits. For example, if you are planning transforms of size 1024, and |
||
400 | later you want a transform of size 2048, most of the calculations of the |
||
401 | 1024 case can be reused. |
||
402 | |||
403 | In short, wisdom does more things with less effort, and seemed like The |
||
404 | Right Thing to do. |
||
405 | |||
406 | =============================================================================== |
||
407 | |||
408 | Section 5. Known bugs |
||
409 | |||
410 | Q5.1 FFTW 1.1 crashes in rfftwnd on Linux. |
||
411 | Q5.2 The MPI transforms in FFTW 1.2 give incorrect results/leak memory. |
||
412 | Q5.3 The test programs in FFTW 1.2.1 fail when I change FFTW to use sin |
||
413 | Q5.4 The test program in FFTW 1.2.1 fails for n > 46340. |
||
414 | Q5.5 The threaded code fails on Linux Redhat 5.0 |
||
415 | Q5.6 FFTW 2.0's rfftwnd fails for rank > 1 transforms with a final dime |
||
416 | Q5.7 FFTW 2.0's complex transforms give the wrong results with prime fa |
||
417 | Q5.8 FFTW 2.1.1's MPI test programs crash with MPICH. |
||
418 | |||
419 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
420 | |||
421 | Question 5.1. FFTW 1.1 crashes in rfftwnd on Linux. |
||
422 | |||
423 | This bug was fixed in FFTW 1.2. There was a bug in rfftwnd causing an |
||
424 | incorrect amount of memory to be allocated. The bug showed up in Linux |
||
425 | with libc-5.3.12 (and nowhere else that we know of). |
||
426 | |||
427 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
428 | |||
429 | Question 5.2. The MPI transforms in FFTW 1.2 give incorrect results/leak memory. |
||
430 | |||
431 | These bugs were corrected in FFTW 1.2.1. The MPI transforms (really, just |
||
432 | the transpose routines) in FFTW 1.2 had bugs that could cause errors in |
||
433 | some situations. |
||
434 | |||
435 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
436 | |||
437 | Question 5.3. The test programs in FFTW 1.2.1 fail when I change FFTW to use single precision. |
||
438 | |||
439 | This bug was fixed in FFTW 1.3. (Older versions of FFTW did work in |
||
440 | single precision, but the test programs didn't--the error tolerances in |
||
441 | the tests were set for double precision.) |
||
442 | |||
443 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
444 | |||
445 | Question 5.4. The test program in FFTW 1.2.1 fails for n > 46340. |
||
446 | |||
447 | This bug was fixed in FFTW 1.3. FFTW 1.2.1 produced the right answer, but |
||
448 | the test program was wrong. For large n, n*n in the naive transform that |
||
449 | we used for comparison overflows 32 bit integer precision, breaking the |
||
450 | test. |
||
451 | |||
452 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
453 | |||
454 | Question 5.5. The threaded code fails on Linux Redhat 5.0 |
||
455 | |||
456 | We had problems with glibc-2.0.5. The code should work with glibc-2.0.7. |
||
457 | |||
458 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
459 | |||
460 | Question 5.6. FFTW 2.0's rfftwnd fails for rank > 1 transforms with a final dimension >= 65536. |
||
461 | |||
462 | This bug was fixed in FFTW 2.0.1. (There was a 32-bit integer overflow |
||
463 | due to a poorly-parenthesized expression.) |
||
464 | |||
465 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
466 | |||
467 | Question 5.7. FFTW 2.0's complex transforms give the wrong results with prime factors 17 to 97. |
||
468 | |||
469 | There was a bug in the complex transforms that could cause incorrect |
||
470 | results under (hopefully rare) circumstances for lengths with |
||
471 | intermediate-size prime factors (17-97). This bug was fixed in FFTW |
||
472 | 2.1.1. |
||
473 | |||
474 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
475 | |||
476 | Question 5.8. FFTW 2.1.1's MPI test programs crash with MPICH. |
||
477 | |||
478 | This was fixed in FFTW 2.1.2. The 2.1/2.1.1 MPI test programs crashed |
||
479 | when using the MPICH implementation of MPI with the ch_p4 device (TCP/IP); |
||
480 | the transforms themselves worked fine. (The source of the bug was some |
||
481 | strange constraints that MPICH imposes on access to the program argument |
||
482 | list.) |
||
483 |